{"id":28829,"date":"2025-02-02T15:04:58","date_gmt":"2025-02-02T15:04:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/popularnews71.net\/?p=28829"},"modified":"2025-02-02T15:04:58","modified_gmt":"2025-02-02T15:04:58","slug":"j-d-vance-tears-into-nbcs-kristen-welker-in-tense-interview-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/popularnews71.net\/?p=28829","title":{"rendered":"J.D. Vance Tears Into NBC\u2019s Kristen Welker In Tense Interview"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/picture>
\u00a0Screenshot<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Republican vice presidential nominee J.D. Vance tore into NBC News host Kristen Welker for constantly trying to bait him with \u201cgotcha\u201d questions during a tense segment.<\/p>\n

During an interview on NBC, Welker repeatedly asked Vance if he agreed with Trump\u2019s suggestions that his Department of Justice could use a special investigator to \u201cgo after\u201d President Joe Biden. Vance said he was not opposed to the idea.<\/p>\n

\u201cSenator, if former President Trump were to win, would you support him appointing a special prosecutor to go after his political enemies, the Bidens?\u201d Welker asked.<\/p>\n

\u201cWell, first of all, Chris said, I find it interesting how much the media and the Democrats have lost their minds over this particular quote. Donald Trump is talking about appointing a special prosecutor to investigate Joe Biden for wrongdoing. Joe Biden has done exactly that for the last few years and has done far more, in addition to that, to engage in a campaign of lawfare against his political opposition. I think what Donald Trump is simply saying is we ought to investigate the prior administration,\u201d Vance began.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere are obviously many instances of wrongdoing. The House Oversight Committee has identified a number of corrupt business transactions that may or may not be criminal. Of course, you have to investigate to find out. So I think Donald Trump saying, look, let\u2019s do the basic work of investigating wrongdoing, is a totally reasonable thing for him to do. And frankly, the Biden administration has done far worse. So if you think that what Donald Trump is proposing is a threat to democracy, isn\u2019t what Biden has already done a massive threat to our system of law and government?\u201d Vance added.<\/p>\n

\u201cSenator, just to be very clear, though, Joe Biden didn\u2019t appoint a special prosecutor, the attorney general did that. Trump was indicted by grand juries. A jury of his peers in New York found him to be guilty. But can we just go back to the core question here? Would you support him taking such an action? It sounds like you\u2019re saying, yes, you would,\u201d Welker followed up.<\/p>\n

Vance shot back: \u201cI would absolutely support investigating prior wrongdoing by our government. Absolutely. That\u2019s what you have to have in a system of law and order. Kristen. But I have to reject the premise here. Joe Biden appointed the attorney general, Merrick Garland, who, of course, answers to Joe Biden and can be fired by Joe Biden. So the idea that the Biden administration has nothing to do with the appointment of the special prosecutor, I think, completely betrays an understanding, a misunderstanding of how our system of government actually works.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cAnd of course, and of course, Kristen, we have to make this point, Kristen, that the prosecution of Donald Trump in New York, which I think now is fundamentally been thrown in doubt by this immunity case, it was one of the main guys was a Department of Justice official in the Biden administration who jumped ship to join a local prosecutor\u2019s office to go after him\u2026You question the legitimacy of the prosecution. That\u2019s a problem,\u201d Vance continued.<\/p>\n

Welker then asked: \u201cSenator, that happens all the time. People are appointed from Washington\u2026The DOJ told Congress this week it reviewed all communications since Biden took office and found no contact between federal prosecutors and those involved with that case in New York. Can you stick to the substance of the question, though? Let me just ask, because I just want to stick with this line of theory that you are laying out, which is you are saying it\u2019s not okay for Joe Biden to weaponize the Justice Department if it\u2019s not okay for Joe Biden to weaponize the Justice Department, as you say, and there\u2019s no evidence of that. Why is it okay for Donald Trump to do that?\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWell, Kristen, first of all, you said that it happens all the time, but the number three person in the Department of Justice jumped ship to join a local prosecutor\u2019s office to go after the president\u2019s political opponent. I don\u2019t think that\u2019s ever happened in the history of American democracy, and I don\u2019t think that we should legitimize it,\u201d Vance responded.<\/p>\n

\u201cNow, if Donald Trump\u2019s attorney general had this, his number two or his number three would have jumped ship to a local prosecutor\u2019s office in Ohio or Wisconsin, and that person would then go after Donald Trump\u2019s political opposition. That\u2019s a different conversation. All he\u2019s suggesting is that we should investigate credible arguments of wrongdoing. That\u2019s all that Donald Trump is saying. That is not a threat to democracy. That\u2019s merely reinforcing our system of law and government,\u201d Vance concluded.<\/p>\n

WATCH:<\/p>\n