A federal judge in San Francisco declined on Tuesday to grant California’s immediate request to stop the deployment of U.S. Marines and National Guard troops to assist with law enforcement activities in the state. Instead, the court scheduled a hearing later this week to further examine the matter.

Senior U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer said he would consider California’s motion for a temporary restraining order during a hearing set for Thursday at 1:30 p.m. The request was part of a broader legal challenge seeking to limit the involvement of military personnel in civilian operations, including immigration-related enforcement.

Attorneys for the state had asked for an emergency ruling before the federal government could respond, but Judge Breyer requested additional written arguments from both sides before making a decision.

In a filing Tuesday afternoon, the U.S. Department of Justice described California’s motion as “legally meritless” and stated that such an order could interfere with operations and compromise the safety of federal personnel.

The legal challenge emerged after federal forces were deployed in response to public unrest following a recent immigration enforcement operation. The situation escalated after a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raid in Los Angeles, prompting additional troops to be sent to help protect federal property and personnel.

According to officials, the additional deployment includes 700 Marines. The military presence, they emphasized, is not tasked with enforcing immigration law but is instead focused on ensuring the safety of federal assets and agencies.

California’s lawsuit argues that using military resources in this way could potentially violate the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act, which limits the use of armed forces for domestic law enforcement purposes. However, the federal government contends that the current deployment respects these legal boundaries.

As tensions continue, the FBI has offered a $50,000 reward for information regarding a recent incident in which an individual was seen throwing rocks at federal vehicles during the unrest.

The upcoming court hearing is expected to clarify the legal standing of the deployment and whether any changes will be made to the federal response strategy.